Sudden attack evolution vietnam8/23/2023 ![]() ![]() If those prerequisites exist, theory suggests a rational actor will back down, after weighing the benefits of the envisioned actions versus the potential costs that may result when the threat is executed. Success furthermore assumes that the demands communicated are acceptable. Success crucially also depends on whether the opponent receives the intended signal, interprets it as intended, and has the perception that the message is congruent with reality, i.e., that the opponent can make good on her threats. Clear communication of demands (a red line for instance), coupled with a credible threat to inflict pain if necessary, and demonstration of resolve are some obvious essential elements for creating effective deterrence. 1 and 2, aims to dissuade an opponent from taking undesirable actions. Indeed, deterrence, as Freedman and Mazarr recount in this volume in respectively Chaps. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |